« Senator Takes a Swing at RIAA | Main | Microsoft Throwing Its Weight Behind Web Search »

September 17, 2003

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834558a7f69e200e5501dcd048833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does Eolas Lawsuit Mean the Death of Flash Ads?:

Comments

*** Dave

Hey, I combine both. PopUpCop not only blocks popups, it blocks Flash execution (though not download), though I can always just click on the box and have the Flash run.

Rich

Cool! One of the annoying things about Google's popup blocker is that when you press a button on the Links bar it thinks it is an unwanted pop up. Does PopupCop do that also? This is annoying while blogging.

Rich

I tried it out and it did what I wanted for not blocking the quick post bookmarklet. Thanks, Dave.

George

Actually, most of modern ad servers make use of the javascript document.write method to display ads. Such external javascript is recommended workaround to avoid that stupid "click to proceed" popups. So love it or not, the Flash ads will survive even without major system fixes.

Benjamin

I use No!Flash while surfing, and it prevents ALL Macromedia Flash ads, animated Gifs, pop-ups, and Javascript. VERY nice when going to sites like news.com.com (cnet), cnn.com, weather.com, and others that like to throw crap all over the screen. It does disable features here (like the auto-jump when you select the forum from the dropdown bar, and the animated smileys), but I can live without those features. It also impacts some other sites I frequent (banking, UPS shipping, etc), so I do have to turn it on and off, depending on what I'm doing. I no longer get 'do you want to download Macromedia Flash' either. If I want to re-enable the features, it's a click of the mouse, fire off a new browser, and it's good to go again. http://www.geocities.jp/baryonlee/noflash/ to download.

The comments to this entry are closed.